klauspost at gmail.com
Sat Jan 2 20:21:24 CET 2010
Yes - as you correctly point out the UI aspect is still in an
unfinished state. Major userside changes will hopefully include:
* Re-worked sharpen. Complete
* Denoise: Complete.
* Tag library: Concept implemented, needs finishing touches.
* Lens correction: Need finishing touches.
* General UI: We are hoping to switch to a tool-state mode, so you can
select which tool you currently work on (WB select, rotate, crop,
etc). Still unimplemented.
* New Color profiles and management: Almost ready, still needs finetuning.
* Export filters: Needs finishing touches.
* Camera settings dialog: Still unimplemented.
I think Anders B is the one with the best overview of the timeframe,
but it is our hope to get 2.0 feature complete before long.
Regards, Klaus Post
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Jonathan Musther <jmusther at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick feedback - I'll wait for the detailed before I comment
> much. Essentially I agree with the points you have identified. The reason
> I did not discuss colour management is because it is 'experimental' in the
> stable release.
> Examples for the 'Image Adjustments and Corrections':
> This is on my to-do list :)
> I am of course happy to update it for 2.0. I feel it would be most
> effective if completed in time to be available when 2.0 is released, which
> of course means starting writing before 2.0 is completed. In order to
> effectively carry this out, I would very much appreciate you (the dev
> mailing list) letting me know when the 2.0 UI is frozen, as I understand it,
> the current SVN UI still has some major changes before the 2.0 release.
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Klaus Post <klauspost at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Looks very good. Precise and to the point, and well illustrated!
>> I plan to give a detailed feedback, but here are some main points:
>> * Raw Image Files
>> Very nice, I don't feel that the average user needs much more
>> information on Raw Image files.
>> The main selling point for many people is the ability to change White
>> Balance without serious image degradation, which is something only RAW
>> is capable of.
>> * Getting Started
>> Even though it is quite a technical issue, I feel there should be a
>> section about "Color Profiles" somewhere around here. It is absolutely
>> essential that the users knows a tiny bit about that. However starting
>> from v2.0, there should hopefully be some very baasic profiles
>> included with RawStudio.
>> * Prioritising and Sorting
>> Very good. You might want to add that you move a picture from deletion
>> by assigning a priority (1,2,3) - something that may not be instantly
>> obvious to a new user.
>> *Image Adjustments and Corrections
>> Two examples to each control would make it much clearer what they are
>> * Contrast
>> Seem to have the content of "Sharpen".
>> Very well written! If it was updated for v2.0, it could be very good
>> to make it available for the users, since it covers the basics very
>> well. It would of course have to be updated with the new features.
>> Regards, Klaus Post
>> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Jonathan Musther <jmusther at gmail.com>
>> > Hi Guys,
>> > I have finished the first version of the documentation for the stable
>> > release of Rawstudio.
>> > Please download it, have a read, let me know if you have improvements,
>> > suggestions, criticisms etc.
>> > http://www.slymail.org/dump/Rawtudio-doc-1.2-1.pdf
>> > Then we can discuss where to go from here.
>> > Cheers
>> > Jon
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Rawstudio-dev mailing list
>> > Rawstudio-dev at rawstudio.org
>> > http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
>> Rawstudio-dev mailing list
>> Rawstudio-dev at rawstudio.org
> Rawstudio-dev mailing list
> Rawstudio-dev at rawstudio.org
More information about the Rawstudio-dev